geda-developers team mailing list archive
-
geda-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00043
Re: geda and gerbv scans
On 2/9/2012 9:29 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:56:09 -0500, Dan McMahill <mcmahill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> On 2/8/2012 5:26 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for persevering. I'm very encouraged by how few defects its found
>>> in
>>> the main gEDA/gaf tools -- gives me a warm fuzzy feeling :-P
>>
>> I was fairly encouraged by how good the core tools look. There is
>> certainly a lot of junk in the various utility programs though.
>>
>> Let me know if we hit a point where I should get another build analyzed.
>> They don't have automatic submissions going yet on the new system but
>> hopefully they will soon.
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I've committed a bunch of Coverity-inspired patches to the 'stable-1.8' and
> 'master' branches of my github repo. Could you please submit a new build
> of 'master'? (I sent details of my repo in my previous dev list e-mail).
>
There should be a new set of results up. I had to edit
libgeda/include/prototype_priv.h because there was a "const const" on
line 152 which probably should have been "const".
-Dan
References