geda-developers team mailing list archive
-
geda-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00190
Re: Additional bug in 1.9.1
Edward Hennessy <ehennes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Peter,
>
> Can a scheme expert also target the following bug for next milestone, 1.9.1?
>
> http://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/commit/?id=7dafcd5e30e957dc1fffbb2eedae5d1a555a6552
>
>
This isn't a "Quick Scheme Hack" problem; it'll likely require adding
new datastructures to libgeda, new Scheme API functions, and reworking
the whole way that copy/paste buffers in gschem work.
So, no, it'll probably not fit into 1.9.1, which I would like to release
fairly soon-ish. Probably by the end of October.
Peter
P.S. Ed, do you have a "things I am working on" list somewhere? It
seems like we may be working at cross-purposes on some things, so having
some idea of what you have planned would be useful for coordination.
Mine is here: https://github.com/peter-b/geda-gaf/wiki/To-Do
--
Dr Peter Brett <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
pgpEuIagIicnP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
References