gnome-colors-packagers team mailing list archive

[Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung@xxxxxxxxx>]

> Could you explain why you think that's something we should have in
karmic?

The new version add some link for renamed or new icons (e.g. usb-
creator-gtk) and it has folder-xdg icons.

> What icon theme ffe do you need and why?

The question refers to _this_ package.

> Does the update breaks icon naming use and current theming?

No, it does not remove / rename icons. It only changes icons, and add
new icon or links. Therefore it shouldn't break anything.

** Attachment added: "deb.diff"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32591988/deb.diff

-- 
Sync gnome-colors 5.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main). 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of GNOME-
Colors Packagers, which is subscribed to gnome-colors in ubuntu.

Status in “gnome-colors” package in Ubuntu: New

Bug description:
Binary package hint: gnome-colors

Please sync gnome-colors 5.5-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main).

Changelog entries since current karmic version 5.3-1:

gnome-colors (5.5-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream release.
  * Allow uploads done by Debian Maintainers.
  * Bump standards version to 3.8.3.

 -- Benjamin Drung <bdrung@xxxxxxxxxx>  Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:42:36 +0200

Here are the upstream changes:

5.5 (2009-09-25)
* New, redesigned folders!
* Add folder-xdg icons for Karmic/GNOME 2.28.
* Add some new icons/update others for better Karmic support.
* Minor bugfixes.

Do I need a FFe for a icon theme package?