graphite-dev team mailing list archive

[Nicholas Leskiw <question197816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Question #197816 on Graphite changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/graphite/+question/197816

    Status: Open => Answered

Nicholas Leskiw proposed the following answer:
Have you tried carcass with -n X --max-procs=Y where X is the number of
processes to spawn and Y is the number of processors to utilize?

bhardy <question197816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Question #197816 on Graphite changed:
>https://answers.launchpad.net/graphite/+question/197816
>
>    Status: Needs information => Open
>
>bhardy gave more information on the question:
>My goal was to use a top-level tree under which resided all the metrics
>I needed to change.  I hoped to issue one command to batch update files.
>I have used subsets (lower directories) just to get timings.
>
>I have tried various invocations of parallel (below) including no "-j"
>at all and none seem to have much benefit over old exec/find.  You can
>ignore the "time" option passed on my command line as I was simply
>testing to get timings and forgot to remove it when I posted this
>question.
>
>-j500
>-j1000
>-j0
>--max-procs=8
>
>-- 
>You received this question notification because you are a member of
>graphite-dev, which is an answer contact for Graphite.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~graphite-dev
>Post to     : graphite-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~graphite-dev
>More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

-- 
You received this question notification because you are a member of
graphite-dev, which is an answer contact for Graphite.