group.of.nepali.translators team mailing list archive

[Martin Pitt <martin.pitt@xxxxxxxxxx>]

What is the test plan here for verifying that there are no regressions
on existing systems? The diff is not reviewable at all, there's
intrusive packaging changes etc., so this needs a rigid test plan to
ensure that there are no regressions. Do we have tests for snaps in the
store? One possibility would be to run the tests for the existing snaps
with the new version and checking for regressions.

** Changed in: ubuntu-core-launcher (Ubuntu)
       Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix

** Changed in: ubuntu-core-launcher (Ubuntu)
       Status: Won't Fix => Invalid

** Changed in: ubuntu-core-launcher (Ubuntu Xenial)
       Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593396

Title:
  [SRU] 1.0.36

Status in ubuntu-core-launcher package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in ubuntu-core-launcher source package in Xenial:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  A new ubuntu-core-launcher release that fixes various issues with
  snapd.

  Changes:
  - ubuntu-core-launcher is renamed to snap-confine to reflect better that it is not ubuntu specific
  - fix nvidia handling
  - bugfixes: #1574556, #1592696, #1592402

  Regression potential:
  - some packaging change that have regression potential but can also be easily tested
  - build changes (switch to autotools etc), little regression potential here
  - code changes: diff looks bigger than it is mostly because the code got split up for easier maintenance
  - features: little regression risk here, nvidia is broken for snaps right now and this change will unbreak it.
  - new features that are disabled on ubuntu (e.g. arch-specific nvidia support) have no regression potential
   - the switch to a chroot-base approach has a regression potential because it changes fundamentally how the snap execution environment looks like but it was tested on ubuntu and many other distributions without any issues.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-core-launcher/+bug/1593396/+subscriptions