group.of.nepali.translators team mailing list archive

[Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,

Accepted snap-confine into xenial-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snap-
confine/1.0.38-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Package changed: ubuntu-core-launcher (Ubuntu) => snap-confine
(Ubuntu)

** Changed in: snap-confine (Ubuntu Xenial)
       Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593396

Title:
  [SRU] 1.0.38

Status in snap-confine package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in snap-confine source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  A new ubuntu-core-launcher release that fixes various issues with
  snapd.

  Changes:
  - ubuntu-core-launcher is renamed to snap-confine to reflect better that it is not ubuntu specific
  - fix nvidia handling
  - bugfixes: #1574556, #1592696, #1592402

  Test plan:
  - run all our existing integration tests (which include running a lot of snap apps via the launcher) against this version of ubuntu-core-launcher/snpa-confine to ensure there are no regressions
  - manual test of the 20 most important snaps

  Regression potential:
  - some packaging change that have regression potential but can also be easily tested
  - build changes (switch to autotools etc), little regression potential here
  - code changes: diff looks bigger than it is mostly because the code got split up for easier maintenance
  - features: little regression risk here, nvidia is broken for snaps right now and this change will unbreak it.
  - new features that are disabled on ubuntu (e.g. arch-specific nvidia support) have no regression potential
   - the switch to a chroot-base approach has a regression potential because it changes fundamentally how the snap execution environment looks like but it was tested on ubuntu and many other distributions without any issues.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snap-confine/+bug/1593396/+subscriptions