group.of.nepali.translators team mailing list archive
-
group.of.nepali.translators team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #08229
[Bug 1628612] Re: prefer "core" rather than "ubuntu-core" if installed
This bug was fixed in the package snap-confine - 1.0.43-0ubuntu1~16.04.1
---------------
snap-confine (1.0.43-0ubuntu1~16.04.1) xenial-proposed; urgency=medium
* Backport from 16.10 (LP: #1630040)
snap-confine (1.0.43-0ubuntu1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* New upstream release (LP: #1630479, LP: #1630492, LP: #1628612)
* debian/patches/lp1630789.patch: allow running snaps by non-root users in
LXD containers (LP: #1630789)
snap-confine (1.0.42-0ubuntu3) yakkety; urgency=medium
* allow snap-confine to mount on /dev/pts/ptmx for LXD with /dev/ptmx
symlink
snap-confine (1.0.42-0ubuntu2) yakkety; urgency=medium
* add mmap to AppArmor policy for snap-confine for running snap-confine
under LXD on 4.8 kernels
snap-confine (1.0.42-0ubuntu1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* New upstream release
* Drop patch skip-nsfs-magic-tests-on-old-kernels.patch (applied upstream)
snap-confine (1.0.41-0ubuntu2) yakkety; urgency=medium
* add skip-nsfs-magic-tests-on-old-kernels.patch to disable NSFS tests on
kernels older than 3.19 (LP: #1625565)
snap-confine (1.0.41-0ubuntu1) yakkety; urgency=medium
* New upstream release, full list of issues is available at
https://launchpad.net/snap-confine/+milestone/1.0.41
* Drop all patches (included upstream).
* Add version to apparmor run-time dependency.
snap-confine (1.0.40-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release, full list of issues is available at
https://launchpad.net/snap-confine/+milestone/1.0.40
* Drop apparmor profile from the debian/ directory and install it straight
from upstream package. This is now automatically consistent with package
configuration prefix.
* Drop patch: prctl-compatibility.patch(applied upstream)
* Add directory /var/lib/snapd/void to snap-confine
* Add patch: 0001-Don-t-shellcheck-files-spread-prepare-script.patch that
fixes make check due to a mistake upstream.
* Add patch: 0001-Stop-using-deprecated-readdir_r.patch (LP: #1615615)
snap-confine (1.0.39-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
* Remove d/patches/01_lp1606277.patch, applied upstream.
snap-confine (1.0.38-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/prctl-compatibility.patch: add shadow definitions for
compatibility with older kernel headers.
* drop build-dependency on shellcheck, which is not used at build time
and doesn't exist in trusty.
* make ubuntu-core-launcher "arch:any" to workaround an issue in
rm_conffile which does not deal with changing architectures
* fix log-observer interface regression (LP: #1606277)
snap-confine (1.0.38-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix invocations of rm_conffile.
* Update d/usr.lib.snapd.snap-confine to the latest upstream version to
ensure content-sharing fully works.
snap-confine (1.0.38-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
-- Jamie Strandboge <jamie@xxxxxxxxxx> Thu, 06 Oct 2016 14:51:26 +0000
** Changed in: snap-confine (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628612
Title:
prefer "core" rather than "ubuntu-core" if installed
Status in Snappy Launcher:
Fix Released
Status in snap-confine package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in snap-confine source package in Xenial:
Fix Released
Bug description:
[Impact]
snap-confine uses the "core" snap as the root filesystem of the
environment where snap applications execute. In the past that was
always "ubuntu-core". The core snap has now been renamed to just
"core" and snap-confine needs to handle this case gracefully.
If both snaps are preset (core and ubuntu-core) then core is preferred
and used. The apparmor profile was adjusted so that both "core" and
"ubuntu-core" names are allowed and internally the code uses two new
functions to find the location of the preferred core snap (one in the
internal filesystem layout and one in the external filesystem layout)
For more information about the execution environment, please see this
article http://www.zygoon.pl/2016/08/snap-execution-environment.html
[Test Case]
The test case can be found here:
https://github.com/snapcore/snap-confine/tree/master/spread-tests/main
/core-is-preferred
The test case is ran automatically for each pull request and for each final release. It can be reproduced manually by executing the shell commands listed in the prepare/execute/restore phases manually.
The commands there assume that snapd and snap-confine are installed.
No other additional setup is necessary.
[Regression Potential]
* Regression potential is minimal and mainly depends on what is
published to the store as the "core" snap. If the core snap would
somehow contain totally bogus content then obviously snaps would cease
to work correctly.
[Other Info]
* snap-confine is technically an integral part of snapd which has an
SRU exception and is allowed to introduce new features and take
advantage of accelerated procedure. For more information see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SnapdUpdates
== # Pre-SRU bug description follows # ==
The system may run with more than one core snap, by default all snaps
should run against the "core" snap but for compatibility the system
should fall back to the "ubuntu-core" snap.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/snap-confine/+bug/1628612/+subscriptions