group.of.nepali.translators team mailing list archive
-
group.of.nepali.translators team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #10532
[Bug 1655181] Re: P9 support in binutils
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Steve Langasek (vorlon) => Matthias Klose (doko)
** Also affects: binutils (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: binutils (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655181
Title:
P9 support in binutils
Status in binutils package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in binutils source package in Xenial:
New
Bug description:
The upstream binutils (2.27 and trunk) is almost complete for POWER9,
but unfortunately the changes expected to land in DD2 hardware have
not yet been set in stone. With that said, the remaining changes are
fairly small and will only affect user space; there are no kernel
dependencies on the unresolved architecture changes.
== Comment: #3 - Peter E. Bergner <bergner@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2016-11-01 10:43:16 ==
Complete POWER9 support is upstream and exists in trunk and the binutils 2.27 and 2.26 release branches.
== Comment: #4 - Breno Henrique Leitao <brenohl@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2016-11-21 12:45:53 ==
(In reply to comment #3)
> Complete POWER9 support is upstream and exists in trunk and the binutils
> 2.27 and 2.26 release branches.
Binutils version 2.27 is already in Ubuntu 17.04. Is there anything
else required?
== Comment: #5 - William J. Schmidt <wschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2016-11-21 13:32:50 ==
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Complete POWER9 support is upstream and exists in trunk and the binutils
> > 2.27 and 2.26 release branches.
>
> Binutils version 2.27 is already in Ubuntu 17.04. Is there anything else
> required?
Well, as long as they pick up the backported fixes, nothing else is
required. That's what this feature is there to ensure.
== Comment: #6 - Breno Henrique Leitao <brenohl@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2016-11-24 06:52:51 ==
Hi,
> Well, as long as they pick up the backported fixes, nothing else is
> required. That's what this feature is there to ensure.
Do you know, at this time, which are the fixes that will be requested
to be backported?
== Comment: #7 - William J. Schmidt <wschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2016-11-28 09:17:01 ==
(In reply to comment #6)
> Hi,
>
> > Well, as long as they pick up the backported fixes, nothing else is
> > required. That's what this feature is there to ensure.
>
> Do you know, at this time, which are the fixes that will be requested to be
> backported?
Peter, can you please respond to Breno's question?
== Comment: #8 - Peter E. Bergner <bergner@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2016-11-29 12:08:11 ==
CC'ing Alan in case he has an extra input.
Looking through the binutils-2_27-branch log, I see the following
commits we would want picked up:
commit 799b679496c98eb1f31625b00bb5db67a6f608d7
Author: Peter Bergner <bergner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Sep 16 16:17:46 2016 -0500
Backport lastest POWER9 support to match final ISA 3.0 documentation.
opcodes/
Apply from master.
2016-09-14 Peter Bergner <bergner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
* ppc-opc.c (powerpc_opcodes) <slbiag>: New mnemonic.
<addex., brd, brh, brw, lwzmx, nandxor, rldixor, setbool,
xor3>: Delete mnemonics.
<cp_abort>: Rename mnemonic from ...
<cpabort>: ...to this.
<setb>: Change to a X form instruction.
<sync>: Change to 1 operand form.
<copy>: Delete mnemonic.
<copy_first>: Rename mnemonic from ...
<copy>: ...to this.
<paste, paste.>: Delete mnemonics.
<paste_last>: Rename mnemonic from ...
<paste.>: ...to this.
gas/
Apply from master.
2016-09-14 Peter Bergner <bergner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
* testsuite/gas/ppc/power9.d <slbiag, cpabort> New tests.
<addex., brd, brh, brw, lwzmx, nandxor, rldixor, setbool,
xor3, cp_abort, copy_first, paste, paste_last, sync>: Remove tests.
<copy, paste.>: Update tests.
* testsuite/gas/ppc/power9.s: Likewise.
commit c6a7c521c14e0cc188ccc0388e0d5d21c2042c94
Author: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Sep 1 14:56:52 2016 +0930
Don't treat .opd section specially when ELFv2
Fixes a gdb segfault if a section named .opd is found in ELFv2 binaries.
* elf64-ppc.c (synthetic_opd): New static var.
(compare_symbols): Don't treat symbols in .opd specially for ELFv2.
(ppc64_elf_get_synthetic_symtab): Likewise. Comment.
commit 2a0b8eb7a7974ff7605cb3ba5dffa5abef286ffa
Author: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Aug 30 20:57:32 2016 +0930
ppc apuinfo for spe parsed incorrectly
apuinfo saying SPE resulted in mach = bfd_mach_ppc_vle due to a
missing break.
PR 20531
* elf32-ppc.c (_bfd_elf_ppc_set_arch): Add missing "break".
commit 7f27ccfcd5b86a6517a5c01d1cc29e87ac39c13c
Author: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Aug 19 11:06:41 2016 +0930
PR 20472, PowerPC64 ifunc confusion
This patch fixes quite a lot of confusion in allocate_dynrelocs over
ifuncs. Function descriptors make ELFv1 quite different to ELFv2.
PR 20472
* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_before_check_relocs): Tweak abiversion test.
(readonly_dynrelocs): Comment fix.
(global_entry_stub): New function.
(ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Tweak abiversion test. Match
ELFv2 code deciding on dynamic relocs vs. global entry stubs to
that in size_global_entry_stubs, handling ifunc too. Delete dead
weak sym code.
(allocate_dynrelocs): Ensure dyn_relocs field is cleared when no
dyn_relocs are needed. Correct handling of ifunc dyn_relocs.
Tidy ELIMINATE_COPY_RELOCS code, only setting dynindx for
undefweak syms. Expand and correct comments.
(size_global_entry_stubs): Ensure symbol is defined.
(ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Match condition under which
dyn_relocs are emitted to that in allocate_dynrelocs.
commit e4aa8a9f60398eacd04398bcc51d7be5f93ed4eb
Author: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Aug 11 12:30:52 2016 +0930
PowerPC64 ELFv1 undefined weak functions
Undefined weak functions, like __gmon_start__, were not being made
dynamic or emitting plt call code. While the behaviour of undefined
weak symbols is not defined in the ELF standard, the intention on
powerpc64 was to make it possible to link without a definition of such
symbols and at run time behave the same as if a definition was found
at link time in a shared library.
* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Don't exit with
non_got_ref true in any case where we could have generated dynbss
copies but decide not to do so.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1655181/+subscriptions