← Back to team overview

group.of.nepali.translators team mailing list archive

[Bug 1726695] Re: Routes are not correctly documented in man pages

 

This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.32~17.10.3

---------------
nplan (0.32~17.10.3) artful; urgency=medium

  * Don't silently break Bridge Priority by adding port-priority.

nplan (0.32~17.10.2) artful; urgency=medium

  * Fix syntax for IPv6 addresses in doc. (LP: #1735317)
  * doc: routes are not top-level but per-interface. (LP: #1726695)
  * Implement bridge port-priority parameter. (LP: #1735821)
  * Implement "optional: true" to correctly write systemd network definitions
    with "RequiredForOnline=false", such that these networks do not block boot.
    (LP: #1664844)
  * Various documentation fixes. (LP: #1751814)

 -- Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <cyphermox@xxxxxxxxxx>  Fri, 02 Mar 2018
16:50:47 -0500

** Changed in: nplan (Ubuntu Artful)
       Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726695

Title:
  Routes are not correctly documented in man pages

Status in netplan:
  Fix Committed
Status in nplan package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nplan source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in nplan source package in Artful:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Impact]
  Netplan users referring to documentation to know how to write configurations.

  [Test case]
  1) check 'man netplan'

  [Regression potential]
  None, this change is limited to correcting incorrect documentation.

  ---

  The only reference to routes in the man page in the complex example at
  the very bottom of the page.

  It's presented as being a top level element and doesn't specify
  interface.  netplan generate will not compile  this useage.

                  routes:
                   - to: 0.0.0.0/0
                     via: 11.0.0.1
                     metric: 3

  Examining the source code, under doc/example-config, there is a
  demonstration of the correct routes configuration which is under and
  interface definition.

  ethernets:
      # opaque ID for physical interfaces, only referred to by other stanzas
      id0:
        match:
          macaddress: 00:11:22:33:44:55
        wakeonlan: true
        dhcp4: true
        addresses:
          - 192.168.14.2/24
          - 2001:1::1/64
        gateway4: 192.168.14.1
        gateway6: 2001:1::2
        routes:
         - to: 11.22.0.0/16
           via: 192.168.14.3
           metric: 100
        nameservers:
          search: [foo.local, bar.local]
          addresses: [8.8.8.8]

  Please update the man page and fill out a complete list of options
  available for a route.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/netplan/+bug/1726695/+subscriptions