group.of.nepali.translators team mailing list archive
-
group.of.nepali.translators team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #26532
[Bug 1797314] Re: fscache: bad refcounting in fscache_op_complete leads to OOPS
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Cosmic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Axtens (daxtens)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली
भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial.
Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797314
Title:
fscache: bad refcounting in fscache_op_complete leads to OOPS
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Xenial:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Cosmic:
In Progress
Bug description:
SRU Justification
-----------------
[Impact]
A kernel BUG is sometimes observed when using fscache:
[4740718.880898] FS-Cache:
[4740718.880920] FS-Cache: Assertion failed
[4740718.880934] FS-Cache: 0 > 0 is false
[4740718.881001] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[4740718.881017] kernel BUG at /usr/src/linux-4.4.0/fs/fscache/operation.c:449!
[4740718.881040] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[4740718.892659] Call Trace:
[4740718.893506] [<ffffffffc1464cf9>] cachefiles_read_copier+0x3a9/0x410 [cachefiles]
[4740718.894374] [<ffffffffc037e272>] fscache_op_work_func+0x22/0x50 [fscache]
[4740718.895180] [<ffffffff81096da0>] process_one_work+0x150/0x3f0
[4740718.895966] [<ffffffff8109751a>] worker_thread+0x11a/0x470
[4740718.896753] [<ffffffff81808e59>] ? __schedule+0x359/0x980
[4740718.897783] [<ffffffff81097400>] ? rescuer_thread+0x310/0x310
[4740718.898581] [<ffffffff8109cdd6>] kthread+0xd6/0xf0
[4740718.899469] [<ffffffff8109cd00>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[4740718.900477] [<ffffffff8180d0cf>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
[4740718.901514] [<ffffffff8109cd00>] ? kthread_park+0x60/0x60
[Problem]
In include/linux/fscache-cache.h, fscache_retrieval_complete reads, in
part:
atomic_sub(n_pages, &op->n_pages);
if (atomic_read(&op->n_pages) <= 0)
fscache_op_complete(&op->op, true);
The code is using atomic_sub followed by an atomic_read. This causes
two threads doing a decrement of pages to race with each other seeing
the op->refcount <= 0 at same time, and end up calling
fscache_op_complete in both the threads leading to the OOPS.
[Fix]
The fix is trivial to use atomic_sub_return instead of two calls.
[Testcase]
I believe the user has tested the patch successfully on their fscache/cachefiles setup.
[Regression Potential]
Limited to fscache. Small, comprehensible change.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1797314/+subscriptions