Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Le 11/06/10 13:18, Luca Invernizzi a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Lionel Dricot<ploum@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi all, Today I've merged Paul's code reorganisation. I've one comment : - the dbus was moved into GTK. I believe that it should not. Instead, there should still be a "view manager" that would be UI agnostic and contains the DBus interface. Any UI, should have to register itself to that view manager and implement a given interface so that, when the viewmanager says "open task X", it does. What do you think ?I agree. We could have a view-manager for each UI, and a meta-view-manager that just acts as a proxy to the current VM. Registering a ui means registering its VM to the meta-VM.
Just my 2 cents...Is it me or the "viewmanager" is actually the controler in an MVC model perspective? In this case, couldn't we just name this file after this naming scheme? It would be more directly identifiable.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors Post to : gtg-contributors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors Post to : gtg-contributors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gtg-contributors More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |