← Back to team overview

gtg team mailing list archive

Re: [Bug 344432] Re: Include recurrent/periodic tasks

 

The status is I think basically everyone agrees it's a nice feature we
need, but no one is working on it since everyone's focused on other
projects.  If you'd like to have a shot at creating a branch to
prototype the feature, that'd probably help move things forward.


On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:29:07AM -0000, Arun Tejasvi Chaganty wrote:
> Hello,
>     What is the status of this bug? I'd really love this feature;
> 
>     I feel the "every <duration>" and "after <days>" implementation
> seems nicest (though I don't know how well it will work in other
> languages) and am willing to implement this.
> 
>     In order to prevent conflicts with text in a tasks' description, for
> example:
> 
> Propose Software Solution for ABC
>     ABC Company would like to automate a process where they take backups every week.
> 
>     I propose using @every and @after as keywords; this would
> automatically categorise tasks as being periodic or scheduled.
> 
>     Another solution would be to have after/every within the title of
> task, but IMHO, that doesn't look too good.
> 
> Cheers,
> Arun.
> 
> -- 
> Include recurrent/periodic tasks
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344432
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gtg
> contributors, which is subscribed to Getting Things GNOME!.
> 
> Status in Getting Things GNOME!: Confirmed
> 
> Bug description:
> I would like to be able to add recurrent tasks to GTG, that is, tasks that I must carry out every day / week / etc.
> 
> Would this be possible?
>

-- 
Include recurrent/periodic tasks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344432
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gtg
contributors, which is subscribed to Getting Things GNOME!.

Status in Getting Things GNOME!: Confirmed

Bug description:
I would like to be able to add recurrent tasks to GTG, that is, tasks that I must carry out every day / week / etc.

Would this be possible?





Follow ups

References