gwibber-team team mailing list archive

[Greg Grossmeier <greg.grossmeier@xxxxxxxxx>]

I talked with Sebastien just now on IRC.

The LGPL thing is in the packaging (debian/copyright) and was changed
by fta just now.

I'm not sure what seb is seeing for the BSD sources.  I grep'd for BSD
and all I could find was the reference to the Spaz twitter client in
the Funkatron README.  It just says that Spaz is licensed under a BSD
license, not that we used any of Spaz's code.

So, unless I am blind, the BSD comment is false.  Please let me know
if that is not true.

greg

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Dominic Evans <oldmanuk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've heard just now from Fabien that the gwibber upload to Jaunty has
> been rejected due to some mismatches in our licensing statements.
>
> i.e.,
>
> "The current gwibber has some issues, there is BSD sources not listed in
> the copyright and the COPYING states it's GPL where the copyright lists
> LGPL as license
>
> Could you fix those an reupload?
>
> Sebastien Bacher"
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-archive/2009-February/024963.html
>
> Is anyone free to fix these issues asap so that Fabien can re-upload a package?
>
> Cheers,
> Dom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gwibber-team
> Post to     : gwibber-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gwibber-team
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>