Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |
Hello Stefan,On Tue, 05 Jul 2016 18:46:38 +1000, Stefan Peter <s_peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
So my conclusion is that something in the libboost implementation of optional has changed between 1.58 and 1.60. And lo and behold, in the release notes of boost 1.60 [1] you can find: Optional: Changed the implementation of boost::none again. Now it is a const object with internal linkage (as any other tag). This fixes #11203. So, this may be the root issue. How to fix this, however, is beyond my pay grade.
Thanks Stefan, I think that explains the cause of the issue. I should have looked a bit more. I guess the solution is probably going to mean checking the version of boost and compiling accordingly. I guess that's up to Chris and Thomas, as it's also beyond my grade...I don't even get paid anymore :-)
Cheers, -- Regards, Terry Duell
Thread Previous • Date Previous • Date Next • Thread Next |