← Back to team overview

hugin-devs team mailing list archive

Re: [Bug 678890] Re: photometric optimisation seems to ignore image settings

 

On December 4, 2010 03:08:12 pm tmodes wrote:
> The "instant" crash is fixed (rev. 57fcdd6c2c89). A warning shows
> currently only up in default branch (rev. ed99ae8486d6), not sure if
> this should also go into 2010.4 branch, because it introduces new
> strings for translations.

If the trade-off is between the beauty of a translated string and the function 
of fixing an instant crash, I'd rather fix the instant crash.  Easy.

If the trade-off is against a silent unexplained non-response (as I understand 
the first half of the fix currently in 2010.4), I am still in favor of adding 
the explanation = string, even if there are chances that it does not get 
translated and that the application looks unpolished.

On with it into 2010.4 and out with a message to translators.

I take care of it *now* - I hit the send button here, I update the strings for 
translation in default, copy the changesets to 2010.4 and issue a note to 
translators on Hugin-PTX.

Yuv

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin
Developers, which is subscribed to Hugin.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678890

Title:
  photometric optimisation seems to ignore image settings

Status in Hugin - Panorama Tools GUI:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  concerns: hugin 0.7.0.3113

I don't know if this is a bug or not.

Maybe it's not, maybe it's several bugs:

Try to run a photometric optimisation of a given panorama with various luminous range 
ie: the sun is present in the panorama and is 'degradding' it.

1-
If you uncheck all option and runs the optimisation, the photometric values will change...
I may be wrong, but photometrics values should not change if no settings is checked...


2- If you try to optimize all images except a given few images:
The optimizer will ignore your settings and will optimizes all images...

If you need a few images showing the problem, I can upload them somewhere. Anyway, it's not specific to images but generic to any photometric optimization





References