hugin-devs team mailing list archive

[kaefert <kaefert@xxxxxxxxx>]

I think I should be running 64bit

kaefert@ultrablech:~$ uname -a
Linux ultrablech 3.8.0-30-generic #44-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 22 20:52:24 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I just found I was telling you wrong stuff, my total picture count of
this set is not 330 but 233 (so actually I was damn close to finishing
the panorama this one time where he failed after loading picture nr.
227)

All 233 jpgs together have a size of 464,6MB - If you want I'll put them
on my webserver like that or if downloading for a few hours is too much
I can use your reducing script first.

This is my detailed enblend version info of the precompiled package from my distro (ubuntu 13.04)
http://pastebin.com/SLMtrHHy
This one worked "best" so far, meaning it gave me the most
enblend: info: loading next image: name0number.tif 1/1
lines before failing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin
Developers, which is subscribed to Enblend.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685105

Title:
  enblend fails to blend large pano

Status in Enblend:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Enblend failed with:

  enblend --compression=LZW -m 1200 -w -f135659x3947+0+1091 -o pano8110_l.tif ....
  ...
  enblend: info: loading next image: pano8110_l0000.tif 1/1
  enblend: out of memory
  enblend: std::bad_alloc

  This is a simple 0.5Gpixel panorama I shot. And agreed, Hugin did warn
  me that it might take a lot of memory.

  The thing is: There is no other tool to stitch this with, so I'll have to make do with hugin and its toolset....
  I thought there was an "imagecache" that would swap parts of images to disk...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/685105/+subscriptions