hugin-devs team mailing list archive

[kaefert <kaefert@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Christoph for the detailed response!

But I don't think that I've hit the MAX_INT Pixel limit with my Panoramas.
I'm trying to create 360 degree panoramas with pictures taken with my Canon Powershot SX280HS which has a 20x zoom lense. 

A panorma that covers about 90 degrees of the sky that I was able to successfully stich together with hugin 2011.4.0.cf9be9344356 (included in the Ubuntu 13.04 repos) resulted in a tif file with the dimensions 91119x3771
4294967295 = 2^32-1
0343609749 = 91119*3771
1374438996 = 91119*3771*4
multiplied by for (90*4=360 degrees) this still leaves a lot of space before it could hit INT_MAX pixels.

If I could make a wish it would be a way to be able to have the zoom levels that I've got in the jpgs linked from within this panorama but directly within the SaladoPlayer.
http://kaefert.is-a-geek.org/SaladoPlayer-1.3.5/

Another thing that would be great for that purpose was if I could
combine pictures of different zoom levels into a panroama with hugin.

Another problem: With hugin 2012 the assistant finds a lot of wrong
control points between pictures that don't overlap - Is there some way
to configure this assistant to only search for controlpoints within
neighboring pictures - like it seems like the 2011 hugin does?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin
Developers, which is subscribed to Enblend.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685105

Title:
  enblend fails to blend large pano

Status in Enblend:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Enblend failed with:

  enblend --compression=LZW -m 1200 -w -f135659x3947+0+1091 -o pano8110_l.tif ....
  ...
  enblend: info: loading next image: pano8110_l0000.tif 1/1
  enblend: out of memory
  enblend: std::bad_alloc

  This is a simple 0.5Gpixel panorama I shot. And agreed, Hugin did warn
  me that it might take a lot of memory.

  The thing is: There is no other tool to stitch this with, so I'll have to make do with hugin and its toolset....
  I thought there was an "imagecache" that would swap parts of images to disk...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/685105/+subscriptions