hugin-devs team mailing list archive

[Pwomack <1500342@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Public bug reported:

I noticed on a large pano that some images had not been exposure optimised.
IN an attempt to force the issue, I reduced the pano to two images, a reference
and the unoptimised "fault".

On repeating the exposure optimise command, I was told the images
had no overlapping pixels, which may well explain the lack of optimisation
in the larger pano, but it happens to be false!

"Error: no overlapping points found, Photometric optimisation aborted"

I have attached the test case; to make the images smaller I edited
them to be a flat colour, which compresses very well :-)

** Affects: hugin
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: exposure optimise overlap

** Attachment added: "exp.pto"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1500342/+attachment/4477284/+files/exp.pto

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin
Developers, which is subscribed to Hugin.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1500342

Title:
  exposure optimiser incorrectly ignoring some pairs

Status in Hugin:
  New

Bug description:
  I noticed on a large pano that some images had not been exposure optimised.
  IN an attempt to force the issue, I reduced the pano to two images, a reference
  and the unoptimised "fault".

  On repeating the exposure optimise command, I was told the images
  had no overlapping pixels, which may well explain the lack of optimisation
  in the larger pano, but it happens to be false!

  "Error: no overlapping points found, Photometric optimisation aborted"

  I have attached the test case; to make the images smaller I edited
  them to be a flat colour, which compresses very well :-)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/1500342/+subscriptions