instant team mailing list archive
-
instant team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00180
Re: [HG instant] Fix for not using cache, ffc should be fine.
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 01:20:29PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> However, with two processes, there will still be a race
> condition during modification of the ~/.instant contents.
> Not sure if there's an easy way to handle that.
> We'll need some sort of locking mechanism on disk.
>
> Since two users will have different cache directories,
> this won't be a problem in that case, and better tempdir
> naming is enough.
How likely is it that two people compile a form on the same machine
and make a call to Instant within the time it takes to create a
directory?
--
Anders
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References
-
[HG instant] Fix for not using cache, ffc should be fine.
From: Instant, 2008-08-12
-
Re: [HG instant] Fix for not using cache, ffc should be fine.
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2008-08-12
-
Re: [HG instant] Fix for not using cache, ffc should be fine.
From: Ilmar Wilbers, 2008-08-28
-
Re: [HG instant] Fix for not using cache, ffc should be fine.
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2008-09-01
-
Re: [HG instant] Fix for not using cache, ffc should be fine.
From: Ilmar Wilbers, 2008-09-01
-
Re: [HG instant] Fix for not using cache, ffc should be fine.
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2008-09-01
-
Re: [HG instant] Fix for not using cache, ffc should be fine.
From: Martin Sandve Alnæs, 2008-09-01