← Back to team overview

instant team mailing list archive

Re: Rewritten code

 

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 10:27:18PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> 2008/9/2  <kent-and@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >>
> >> I'll fix the numarray/Numeric code although I
> >> guess nobody uses it.
> >>
> >
> > Both Numeric and numarray work on my machine, but the test examples used the
> > same cache_dir and this caused trouble.
> >
> > Kent
> 
> Then the bug is really in the cache mechanism: we must add more
> stuff to the cache_md5sum. If cache_dir isn't provided manually,
> the default instant cache dir should always work transparently.

Should we use SHA-1 instead of MD5? It would be enough to use the
first 10 characters of the SHA-1 hash (which is what Mercurial uses
for changesets I think) or we could do all 40.

-- 
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Follow ups

References