← Back to team overview

instant team mailing list archive

Re: Rewritten code

 

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 10:35:12PM +0200, kent-and@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > 2008/9/2  <kent-and@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I'll fix the numarray/Numeric code although I
> >>> guess nobody uses it.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Both Numeric and numarray work on my machine, but the test examples used
> >> the
> >> same cache_dir and this caused trouble.
> >>
> >> Kent
> >
> > Then the bug is really in the cache mechanism: we must add more
> > stuff to the cache_md5sum. If cache_dir isn't provided manually,
> > the default instant cache dir should always work transparently.
> >
> >
> 
> Agree.
> If no signature is provided then the md5 sum should probably computed from
> both the interface file, the possible additional code, and the setup.py
> file. This should
> be sufficient, right ?
> 
> Kent

Should we also include all (or some) of the options to
create_extension, in particular compiler flags?

-- 
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


References