instant team mailing list archive
-
instant team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00369
Re: What remains before we can release Instant 1.0 ?
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 10:56:16 Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Kent Andre <kent-and@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On ti., 2009-01-13 at 10:14 +0100, Johan Hake wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 13 January 2009 09:59:30 Kent Andre wrote:
> >> > As always, improved documentation and better tests.
> >> > Anything else ?
> >>
> >> I have expanded the kwargs in build() with swig_include_dirs, wo be able
> >> to %import other swig modules. I needed this for the shared_ptr stuff.
> >> This will not break anything, so I can send a patch now or I can wait.
> >> You deside.
> >>
> >> Johan
> >
> > I've used swigopt to set swig_include_dirs, but it may not be obvious.
> >
> > Kent
>
> I think that's fine, and we probably don't want to duplicate all
> possible commandline options...
The problem with swigargs (not swigopt) is that this comes with a lot
predfined options, which all make sense, e.g., -c++, -I. (well, we could
skip -fcompact and -small, makeing the produced wrapper code readable).
When I then put e.g., [-I/path/to/something] as a swigargs it will exclude the
rest. This is not a big issue, but it was not obvious that I should put
include directories in swig_args.
Having one argument for general swig options and one for include directories
didn't seem too overkill for me.
Johan
Follow ups
References