inx-devel team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: [Inx] Thread Two: RC-3 or not?

To: Peter Garrett <inx-one@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jared Bernard <jared.bernard@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:15:36 -0600 (MDT)
Cc: inx-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, inx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080909071048.2c353253.inx-one@optusnet.com.au>

Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Peter Garrett wrote:

Should there be an RC-3?

Should the next INX version be 1.0 ?

Is it almost ready to be 1.0? Should we do the "E" and "Google" thing
and be in perpetual Beta/ RC / Version 0.99999 repeated?

Should we have an "inx-unstable" that gets all the latest crack?

RSVP....

Peter

--
"INX Is Not X" Live CD based on Ubuntu 8.04 : http://inx.maincontent.net
Screenshots slideshow: http://inx.maincontent.net/album/1.png.html

I've always preferred the 2008.xx versioning or something else thatreflects the date. I definitely don't like the perpetual beta. An unstableis a good idea.

Jared

References

Thread Two: RC-3 or not?
From: Peter Garrett, 2008-09-08