kernel-packages team mailing list archive

[Adam Conrad <adconrad@xxxxxxx>]

** Description changed:

- The installed DTBs have moved into vendor specific directories.  We need
- to 1) make sure we are hoovering them up right, and 2) that the
- consumers thereof (d-i etc) are consuming them in the new locations.
+ [ SRU Justification ]
+ For trusty, the lts-vivid debian-installer builds install the lts-vivid kernel, which has the DTBs in the new location.  As such, both d-i and f-k need fixing to look for the correct locations.
+ 
+ [ Test Case ]
+ For d-i, the test case is to build d-i and ensure it's picking up the right DTBs for both old and new location builds.
+ 
+ For f-k, the test case is to do an installation of both lts-utopic and
+ lts-vivid on arm64 and ensure that flash-kernel is operating on the DTBs
+ without error in both cases.
+ 
+ [ Regression Potential ]
+ The d-i change has already been tested in a PPA and is known-good, while the f-k change is a straight cherry-pick from vivid, where it was known to work, so both should be minimally scary.
+ 
+ [ Original Report ]
+ The installed DTBs have moved into vendor specific directories.  We need to 1) make sure we are hoovering them up right, and 2) that the consumers thereof (d-i etc) are consuming them in the new locations.
  
  NOTE: this actually is only _installed_ into those new directories on
  arm64.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1408004

Title:
  devel: DTBs have moved into vendor specific directories on arm64

Status in debian-installer package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in flash-kernel package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in debian-installer source package in Trusty:
  In Progress
Status in flash-kernel source package in Trusty:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Trusty:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [ SRU Justification ]
  For trusty, the lts-vivid debian-installer builds install the lts-vivid kernel, which has the DTBs in the new location.  As such, both d-i and f-k need fixing to look for the correct locations.

  [ Test Case ]
  For d-i, the test case is to build d-i and ensure it's picking up the right DTBs for both old and new location builds.

  For f-k, the test case is to do an installation of both lts-utopic and
  lts-vivid on arm64 and ensure that flash-kernel is operating on the
  DTBs without error in both cases.

  [ Regression Potential ]
  The d-i change has already been tested in a PPA and is known-good, while the f-k change is a straight cherry-pick from vivid, where it was known to work, so both should be minimally scary.

  [ Original Report ]
  The installed DTBs have moved into vendor specific directories.  We need to 1) make sure we are hoovering them up right, and 2) that the consumers thereof (d-i etc) are consuming them in the new locations.

  NOTE: this actually is only _installed_ into those new directories on
  arm64.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1408004/+subscriptions