kernel-packages team mailing list archive

[Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Andy, or anyone else affected,

Accepted flash-kernel into trusty-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-
kernel/3.0~rc.4ubuntu49.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.

Please help us by testing this new package.  See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed.  Your feedback will aid us getting this update
out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
verification-failed.  In either case, details of your testing will help
us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification .  Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu Trusty)
       Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1408004

Title:
  devel: DTBs have moved into vendor specific directories on arm64

Status in debian-installer package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in flash-kernel package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in debian-installer source package in Trusty:
  In Progress
Status in flash-kernel source package in Trusty:
  Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Trusty:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  [ SRU Justification ]
  For trusty, the lts-vivid debian-installer builds install the lts-vivid kernel, which has the DTBs in the new location.  As such, both d-i and f-k need fixing to look for the correct locations.

  [ Test Case ]
  For d-i, the test case is to build d-i and ensure it's picking up the right DTBs for both old and new location builds.

  For f-k, the test case is to do an installation of both lts-utopic and
  lts-vivid on arm64 and ensure that flash-kernel is operating on the
  DTBs without error in both cases.

  [ Regression Potential ]
  The d-i change has already been tested in a PPA and is known-good, while the f-k change is a straight cherry-pick from vivid, where it was known to work, so both should be minimally scary.

  [ Original Report ]
  The installed DTBs have moved into vendor specific directories.  We need to 1) make sure we are hoovering them up right, and 2) that the consumers thereof (d-i etc) are consuming them in the new locations.

  NOTE: this actually is only _installed_ into those new directories on
  arm64.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1408004/+subscriptions