kernel-packages team mailing list archive

[Dan Searle <1486146@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Joseph,

I re-created the issue on a new install of Ubuntu 14.04.3 (amd64)
running the linux-image-3.19.0-26-generic kernel using the following
code:

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <netinet/ip.h>

int main(void)
{
                struct sockaddr_in           addr = {
                                .sin_family          = AF_INET,
                                .sin_port              = htons(1234),                                  
                                .sin_addr             = { INADDR_ANY }
                };
                int                                           conn;
                char                                       buf[16];

                int                                           s =
socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, 0);

                bind(s, (void *)&addr, sizeof addr);
                listen(s, 1);

                conn = accept(s, NULL, 0);

                recv(conn, buf, sizeof buf, MSG_PEEK|MSG_WAITALL);
}
----
$ gcc x.c
$ ./a.out &

$ nc 127.0.0.1 1234
1234<enter>

--> 'a.out' consumes 100% CPU

----

After downloading and installing kernel packages from
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~jsalisbury/lp1486146/ I rebooted, and re-ran
the test as above, this time 'a.out' does not consume 100% CPU any more,
so the bug seems fixed at least in this simple test case using the
replacement kernel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1486146

Title:
  recvfrom SYSCALL infinite loop/deadlock chewing 100% CPU
  (MSG_PEEK|MSG_WAITALL)

Status in Linux:
  Unknown
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in linux source package in Trusty:
  Triaged
Status in linux source package in Vivid:
  Triaged
Status in linux source package in Wily:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  In a multi-threaded pthreads process running on Ubuntu 14.04 AMD64
  (with over 1000 threads) which uses real time FIFO scheduling, we
  occasionally see calls to recv() with flags (MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL)
  get stuck in an infinte loop or deadlock meaning the threads lock up
  chewing as much CPU as they can (due to FIFO scheduling) while stuck
  inside recv().

  Here's an example gdb back trace:

  [Switching to thread 4 (Thread 0x7f6040546700 (LWP 27251))]
  #0  0x00007f6231d2f7eb in __libc_recv (fd=fd@entry=146, buf=buf@entry=0x7f6040543600, n=n@entry=5, flags=-1, flags@entry=258) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/recv.c:33
  33      ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/recv.c: No such file or directory.
  (gdb) bt
  #0  0x00007f6231d2f7eb in __libc_recv (fd=fd@entry=146, buf=buf@entry=0x7f6040543600, n=n@entry=5, flags=-1, flags@entry=258) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/recv.c:33
  #1  0x0000000000421945 in recv (__flags=258, __n=5, __buf=0x7f6040543600, __fd=146) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/socket2.h:44
  [snip]

  The socket is a TCP socket in blocking mode, the recv() call is inside
  an outer loop with a counter, and I've checked the counter with gdb
  and it's always at 1, meaning that I'm sure that the outer loop isn't
  the problem, the thread is indeed deadlocked inside the recv()
  internals.

  Other nodes: 
  * There always seems to be 2 or more threads deadlocked in the same place (same recv() call but with distinct FDs)
  * The threads calling recv() have cancellation disbaled by previously executing: thread_setcancelstate(PTHREAD_CANCEL_DISABLE, NULL);

  I've even tried adding a poll() call for POLLRDNORM on the socket
  before calling recv() with MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL flags to try to make
  sure there's data available on the socket before calling *recv()*, but
  it makes no difference.

  So, I don't know what is wrong here, I've read all the recv()
  documentation and believe that recv() is being used correctly, the
  only conclusion I can come to is that there is a bug in libc recv()
  when using flags MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL with thousands of pthreads
  running.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1486146/+subscriptions