kernel-packages team mailing list archive
-
kernel-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #161574
[Bug 1519897] Re: [Hyper-V] hv: vmbus: Fix a host signaling bug
Based on the numbers here, I will continue to include some patches or suggestions we got from Haiyang, and send an update later.
You should be able to push the update as this seems to be a problem with 3.13 entire tree, then in a separate thread we can identify the missing patches.
These are the numbers that we have when running a simple test with ntttcp.
All the below 3 kernels have been installed from the trusty-proposed repo.
As a reference, on the same system but with the latest available kernel we have this:
Kernel: lts-vivid - 3.19.0.50 (56)
Throughput: 12.87Gbps
Our historical perf testing includes only kernel 3.16.0-59 for 14.04,
for which we got a throughput of 18.02 Gbps.
Distribution release: Ubuntu 14.04.3
Kernel: 3.13.0-76-generic (120)
Throughput: 1.53Gbps
Kernel: 3.13.0-77-generic (121)
Throughput: 1.41Gbps
Kernel: 3.13.0-78-generic (122)
Throughput: 1.50Gbps
Going back to try and find a good build, picking up the first 3.13 kernel:
Kernel: 3.13.0-24-generic (122)
Throughput: 1.50Gbps
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519897
Title:
[Hyper-V] hv: vmbus: Fix a host signaling bug
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Status in linux-lts-trusty package in Ubuntu:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Trusty:
Fix Committed
Status in linux-lts-trusty source package in Trusty:
In Progress
Status in linux source package in Wily:
Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Xenial:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
The following fix has been submitted upstream, but has high enough
severity that we would like early inclusion into the Ubuntu kernel.
Please consider for wily, vivid, and trusty (and the HWE kernels for
the same).
Patch follows:
Currently we have two policies for deciding when to signal the host:
One based on the ring buffer state and the other based on what the VMBUS client driver wants to do. Consider the case when the client wants to explicitly control when to signal the host. In this case, if the client were to defer signaling, we will not be able to signal the host subsequently when the client does want to signal since the ring buffer state will prevent the signaling. Implement logic to have only one signaling policy in force for a given channel.
Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.2+
---
drivers/hv/channel.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/hyperv.h | 12 ++++++++++++
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hv/channel.c b/drivers/hv/channel.c index 77d2579..c6278c7 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/channel.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/channel.c
@@ -653,10 +653,19 @@ int vmbus_sendpacket_ctl(struct vmbus_channel *channel, void *buffer,
* on the ring. We will not signal if more data is
* to be placed.
*
+ * Based on the channel signal state, we will decide
+ * which signaling policy will be applied.
+ *
* If we cannot write to the ring-buffer; signal the host
* even if we may not have written anything. This is a rare
* enough condition that it should not matter.
*/
+
+ if (channel->signal_state)
+ signal = true;
+ else
+ kick_q = true;
+
if (((ret == 0) && kick_q && signal) || (ret))
vmbus_setevent(channel);
@@ -756,10 +765,19 @@ int vmbus_sendpacket_pagebuffer_ctl(struct vmbus_channel *channel,
* on the ring. We will not signal if more data is
* to be placed.
*
+ * Based on the channel signal state, we will decide
+ * which signaling policy will be applied.
+ *
* If we cannot write to the ring-buffer; signal the host
* even if we may not have written anything. This is a rare
* enough condition that it should not matter.
*/
+
+ if (channel->signal_state)
+ signal = true;
+ else
+ kick_q = true;
+
if (((ret == 0) && kick_q && signal) || (ret))
vmbus_setevent(channel);
diff --git a/include/linux/hyperv.h b/include/linux/hyperv.h index 437c9c8..7b1af52 100644
--- a/include/linux/hyperv.h
+++ b/include/linux/hyperv.h
@@ -756,8 +756,20 @@ struct vmbus_channel {
* link up channels based on their CPU affinity.
*/
struct list_head percpu_list;
+ /*
+ * Host signaling policy: The default policy will be
+ * based on the ring buffer state. We will also support
+ * a policy where the client driver can have explicit
+ * signaling control.
+ */
+ bool signal_state;
};
+static inline void set_channel_signal_state(struct vmbus_channel *c,
+bool state) {
+ c->signal_state = state;
+}
+
static inline void set_channel_read_state(struct vmbus_channel *c, bool state) {
c->batched_reading = state;
--
1.7.4.1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1519897/+subscriptions
References