kernel-packages team mailing list archive
-
kernel-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #163845
[Bug 1548414] Re: Floating-point exception handler receives empty Data-Exception Code in Floating Point Control register
New kernel upload has entered xenial-proposed, and is being tested
before migrating to release component
For full changelog see:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/4.4.0-9.24
Kernel release process workflow bug for this kernel is at:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1551319
To see progress of this kernel being released to xenial release
component.
Highlights from the changelog:
* s390x: correct restore of high gprs on signal return (LP: #1550468)
- s390/compat: correct restore of high gprs on signal return
* Floating-point exception handler receives empty Data-Exception Code in
Floating Point Control register (LP: #1548414)
- s390/fpu: signals vs. floating point control register
* Various failures of kernel_security suite on Xenial kernel on s390x arch
(LP: #1531327)
- [config] s390x -- CONFIG_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR=65536
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1548414
Title:
Floating-point exception handler receives empty Data-Exception Code in
Floating Point Control register
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Status in linux source package in Xenial:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
== Comment: #0 - Alexander Efremkin <a.efremkin@xxxxxxxxxx> - 2016-02-17 12:18:14 ==
With a C program sets FPE handler and triggers an FPE exception, it expects that machine-dependent context data, which is passed to the handler, will contain sensible values.
In this scenario, however, FPC register was zero and contained no DXC
(Data-Exception Code) indication:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <signal.h>
void trapFunction() {
asm volatile ("lhi %r1,0\n\t"
"cit %r1,0,8\n\t");
}
static void sigFPE_handler(int signal, siginfo_t *info, void *context) {
ucontext_t *uc = context;
mcontext_t mc = uc->uc_mcontext;
fpregset_t fpregs = mc.fpregs;
unsigned int fpc = fpregs.fpc;
printf("received signal!\n");
printf("fpc: %08x\n", fpc );
}
int main() {
struct sigaction action;
memset(&action, '\0', sizeof(action));
printf("registering signal handler\n");
action.sa_flags |= SA_SIGINFO;
action.sa_sigaction = sigFPE_handler;
if (sigaction(SIGFPE, &action, NULL))
printf("error calling sigaction\n");
printf("firing trap\n");
trapFunction();
return 0;
}
This program prints "fpc: 00000000", but the expected output is "fpc:
0000ff00"..
The IBM Java team has encountered test failures around the use of trap
instructions; Linux on z Distribution Test reproduced the issue on the
following system:
z13 LPAR
Ubuntu 16.04
Kernel 4.4.0-4-generic
gcc (Ubuntu 5.3.1-8ubuntu2) 5.3.1 20160205
libc6 2.21-0ubuntu5
Also, similar issue has been found during test of SIMD (vector)
instructions, FPC contents was also zero, whereas it expected at least
an exception mask and vector-defined DXC.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1548414/+subscriptions