kernel-packages team mailing list archive
-
kernel-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #176883
[Bug 1579278] [NEW] Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance"
Public bug reported:
Hi,
With the new Ubuntu archive servers, we saw constantly high load and
after some tinkering, we found that it was mostly CPUs being woken up to
see if they should enter idle states. Changing the CPU frequency scaling
governor to "performance" saw a considerable drop.
Perf report using the following commands:
| perf record -g -a sleep 10
| perf report
| Samples: 287K of event 'cycles:pp', Event count (approx.): 124776998906
| Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol
| + 55.24% 0.20% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpu_startup_entry
| + 53.51% 0.00% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] start_secondary
| + 53.02% 0.08% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] call_cpuidle
| + 52.94% 0.02% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_enter
| + 31.81% 0.67% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_enter_state
| + 29.59% 0.12% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] acpi_idle_enter
| + 29.45% 0.05% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] acpi_idle_do_entry
| + 29.43% 29.43% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter
| + 20.51% 0.04% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ret_from_intr
| + 20.47% 0.12% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] do_IRQ
| + 19.30% 0.07% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] irq_exit
| + 19.18% 0.07% apache2 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
| + 18.80% 0.17% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __do_softirq
| + 16.45% 0.11% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] net_rx_action
| + 16.25% 0.43% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] be_poll
| + 14.74% 0.21% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] be_process_rx
| + 13.61% 0.07% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] napi_gro_frags
| + 12.58% 0.04% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] netif_receive_skb_internal
| + 12.48% 0.03% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __netif_receive_skb
| + 12.42% 0.24% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __netif_receive_skb_core
| + 12.41% 0.00% apache2 [unknown] [k] 0x00007f27983b5028
| + 12.41% 0.00% apache2 [unknown] [k] 0x00007f2798369028
| + 11.49% 0.16% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_rcv
| + 11.29% 0.09% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_rcv_finish
| + 10.77% 0.05% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_local_deliver
| + 10.70% 0.06% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_local_deliver_finish
| + 10.55% 0.22% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] tcp_v4_rcv
| + 10.10% 0.00% apache2 [unknown] [k] 0000000000000000
| + 10.01% 0.04% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] tcp_v4_do_rcv
Expanding in a few of those, you'll see:
| - 55.24% 0.20% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpu_startup_entry
| - 55.04% cpu_startup_entry
| - 52.98% call_cpuidle
| + 52.93% cpuidle_enter
| + 0.00% ret_from_intr
| 0.00% cpuidle_enter_state
| 0.00% irq_entries_start
| + 1.14% cpuidle_select
| + 0.47% schedule_preempt_disabled
| 0.10% rcu_idle_enter
| 0.09% rcu_idle_exit
| + 0.05% ret_from_intr
| + 0.05% tick_nohz_idle_enter
| + 0.04% arch_cpu_idle_enter
| 0.02% cpuidle_enter
| 0.02% tick_check_broadcast_expired
| + 0.01% cpuidle_reflect
| 0.01% menu_reflect
| 0.01% atomic_notifier_call_chain
| 0.01% local_touch_nmi
| 0.01% cpuidle_not_available
| 0.01% menu_select
| 0.01% cpuidle_get_cpu_driver
| + 0.01% tick_nohz_idle_exit
| + 0.01% sched_ttwu_pending
| 0.00% set_cpu_sd_state_idle
| 0.00% native_irq_return_iret
| 0.00% schedule
| + 0.00% arch_cpu_idle_exit
| 0.00% __tick_nohz_idle_enter
| 0.00% irq_entries_start
| 0.00% sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event
| 0.00% reschedule_interrupt
| + 0.00% apic_timer_interrupt
| + 0.20% start_secondary
| + 0.00% x86_64_start_kernel
| + 53.51% 0.00% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] start_secondary
| + 53.02% 0.08% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] call_cpuidle
| - 52.94% 0.02% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_enter
| - 52.92% cpuidle_enter
| + 31.81% cpuidle_enter_state
| + 20.01% ret_from_intr
| + 0.51% apic_timer_interrupt
| 0.28% native_irq_return_iret
| + 0.09% reschedule_interrupt
| 0.05% irq_entries_start
| 0.05% do_IRQ
| 0.05% common_interrupt
| 0.02% sched_idle_set_state
| 0.01% acpi_idle_enter
| 0.01% ktime_get
| 0.01% restore_regs_and_iret
| 0.01% restore_c_regs_and_iret
| + 0.01% call_function_single_interrupt
| 0.00% native_iret
| + 0.00% call_function_interrupt
| 0.00% smp_apic_timer_interrupt
| 0.00% smp_reschedule_interrupt
| 0.00% smp_call_function_single_interrupt
| + 0.02% start_secondary
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579278
Title:
Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to
"performance"
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Status in linux source package in Xenial:
Incomplete
Bug description:
Hi,
With the new Ubuntu archive servers, we saw constantly high load and
after some tinkering, we found that it was mostly CPUs being woken up
to see if they should enter idle states. Changing the CPU frequency
scaling governor to "performance" saw a considerable drop.
Perf report using the following commands:
| perf record -g -a sleep 10
| perf report
| Samples: 287K of event 'cycles:pp', Event count (approx.): 124776998906
| Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol
| + 55.24% 0.20% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpu_startup_entry
| + 53.51% 0.00% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] start_secondary
| + 53.02% 0.08% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] call_cpuidle
| + 52.94% 0.02% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_enter
| + 31.81% 0.67% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_enter_state
| + 29.59% 0.12% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] acpi_idle_enter
| + 29.45% 0.05% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] acpi_idle_do_entry
| + 29.43% 29.43% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_enter
| + 20.51% 0.04% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ret_from_intr
| + 20.47% 0.12% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] do_IRQ
| + 19.30% 0.07% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] irq_exit
| + 19.18% 0.07% apache2 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
| + 18.80% 0.17% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __do_softirq
| + 16.45% 0.11% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] net_rx_action
| + 16.25% 0.43% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] be_poll
| + 14.74% 0.21% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] be_process_rx
| + 13.61% 0.07% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] napi_gro_frags
| + 12.58% 0.04% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] netif_receive_skb_internal
| + 12.48% 0.03% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __netif_receive_skb
| + 12.42% 0.24% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __netif_receive_skb_core
| + 12.41% 0.00% apache2 [unknown] [k] 0x00007f27983b5028
| + 12.41% 0.00% apache2 [unknown] [k] 0x00007f2798369028
| + 11.49% 0.16% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_rcv
| + 11.29% 0.09% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_rcv_finish
| + 10.77% 0.05% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_local_deliver
| + 10.70% 0.06% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] ip_local_deliver_finish
| + 10.55% 0.22% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] tcp_v4_rcv
| + 10.10% 0.00% apache2 [unknown] [k] 0000000000000000
| + 10.01% 0.04% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] tcp_v4_do_rcv
Expanding in a few of those, you'll see:
| - 55.24% 0.20% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpu_startup_entry
| - 55.04% cpu_startup_entry
| - 52.98% call_cpuidle
| + 52.93% cpuidle_enter
| + 0.00% ret_from_intr
| 0.00% cpuidle_enter_state
| 0.00% irq_entries_start
| + 1.14% cpuidle_select
| + 0.47% schedule_preempt_disabled
| 0.10% rcu_idle_enter
| 0.09% rcu_idle_exit
| + 0.05% ret_from_intr
| + 0.05% tick_nohz_idle_enter
| + 0.04% arch_cpu_idle_enter
| 0.02% cpuidle_enter
| 0.02% tick_check_broadcast_expired
| + 0.01% cpuidle_reflect
| 0.01% menu_reflect
| 0.01% atomic_notifier_call_chain
| 0.01% local_touch_nmi
| 0.01% cpuidle_not_available
| 0.01% menu_select
| 0.01% cpuidle_get_cpu_driver
| + 0.01% tick_nohz_idle_exit
| + 0.01% sched_ttwu_pending
| 0.00% set_cpu_sd_state_idle
| 0.00% native_irq_return_iret
| 0.00% schedule
| + 0.00% arch_cpu_idle_exit
| 0.00% __tick_nohz_idle_enter
| 0.00% irq_entries_start
| 0.00% sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event
| 0.00% reschedule_interrupt
| + 0.00% apic_timer_interrupt
| + 0.20% start_secondary
| + 0.00% x86_64_start_kernel
| + 53.51% 0.00% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] start_secondary
| + 53.02% 0.08% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] call_cpuidle
| - 52.94% 0.02% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_enter
| - 52.92% cpuidle_enter
| + 31.81% cpuidle_enter_state
| + 20.01% ret_from_intr
| + 0.51% apic_timer_interrupt
| 0.28% native_irq_return_iret
| + 0.09% reschedule_interrupt
| 0.05% irq_entries_start
| 0.05% do_IRQ
| 0.05% common_interrupt
| 0.02% sched_idle_set_state
| 0.01% acpi_idle_enter
| 0.01% ktime_get
| 0.01% restore_regs_and_iret
| 0.01% restore_c_regs_and_iret
| + 0.01% call_function_single_interrupt
| 0.00% native_iret
| + 0.00% call_function_interrupt
| 0.00% smp_apic_timer_interrupt
| 0.00% smp_reschedule_interrupt
| 0.00% smp_call_function_single_interrupt
| + 0.02% start_secondary
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1579278/+subscriptions
Follow ups
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Keep powersave CPU frequency scaling governor for CPUs that support intel_pstate
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2016-06-24
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Keep powersave CPU frequency scaling governor for CPUs that support intel_pstate
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-06-08
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-06-08
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-06-08
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
From: Haw Loeung, 2016-05-23
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
From: Haw Loeung, 2016-05-23
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
From: Greg Mason, 2016-05-13
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
From: Haw Loeung, 2016-05-09
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
From: Tim Gardner, 2016-05-09
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
From: Tim Gardner, 2016-05-09
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
From: Joseph Salisbury, 2016-05-09
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance" (Ubuntu Server)
From: Haw Loeung, 2016-05-07
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance"
From: Haw Loeung, 2016-05-07
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance"
From: Greg Mason, 2016-05-07
-
[Bug 1579278] Missing required logs.
From: Brad Figg, 2016-05-07
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance"
From: Haw Loeung, 2016-05-07
-
[Bug 1579278] Re: Consider changing default CPU frequency scaling governor back to "performance"
From: Haw Loeung, 2016-05-07