kernel-packages team mailing list archive
-
kernel-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #179915
[Bug 1584124] [NEW] revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
Public bug reported:
We've been carrying /etc/init.d/ondemand for many years. We should
revisit if booting with a kernel that defaults to "ondemand" right away
is still actually slower than "performance".
In the short term, systemd should grow a "Type=idle" unit that switches
to ondemand, to replace the static "1 minute" sleep. This will also get
rid of the last init.d script in "initscripts" that we actually use, and
pave the way for dropping the initscripts package.
In the long term, we could drop it completely if "ondemand" DTRT.
** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Colin Ian King (colin-king)
Status: Confirmed
** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Assignee: Martin Pitt (pitti)
Status: Triaged
** Tags: bot-stop-nagging
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Tags added: bot-stop-nagging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1584124
Title:
revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
We've been carrying /etc/init.d/ondemand for many years. We should
revisit if booting with a kernel that defaults to "ondemand" right
away is still actually slower than "performance".
In the short term, systemd should grow a "Type=idle" unit that
switches to ondemand, to replace the static "1 minute" sleep. This
will also get rid of the last init.d script in "initscripts" that we
actually use, and pave the way for dropping the initscripts package.
In the long term, we could drop it completely if "ondemand" DTRT.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1584124/+subscriptions
Follow ups
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Launchpad Bug Tracker, 2016-06-24
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-06-08
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-06-08
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-06-08
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: dino99, 2016-06-08
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-06-08
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-06-08
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-06-08
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Colin Ian King, 2016-06-07
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-05-23
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Haw Loeung, 2016-05-20
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Martin Pitt, 2016-05-20
-
[Bug 1584124] Re: revisit /etc/init.d/ondemand
From: Colin Ian King, 2016-05-20