kernel-packages team mailing list archive
-
kernel-packages team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #43785
[Bug 1274349] Re: Fix-compat_sys_recvmmsg-on-x32-archs
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-armadaxp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1274349
Title:
Fix-compat_sys_recvmmsg-on-x32-archs
Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Status in “linux-armadaxp” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ec2” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-quantal” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-raring” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-saucy” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “linux-mvl-dove” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ti-omap4” package in Ubuntu:
Invalid
Status in “linux” source package in Lucid:
Invalid
Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Lucid:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Lucid:
Invalid
Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Lucid:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-quantal” source package in Lucid:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-raring” source package in Lucid:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-saucy” source package in Lucid:
Invalid
Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Lucid:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Lucid:
Invalid
Status in “linux” source package in Precise:
Invalid
Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Precise:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Precise:
Invalid
Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Precise:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-quantal” source package in Precise:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-raring” source package in Precise:
Fix Released
Status in “linux-lts-saucy” source package in Precise:
Fix Released
Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Precise:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Precise:
Invalid
Status in “linux” source package in Quantal:
Invalid
Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Quantal:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Quantal:
Invalid
Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Quantal:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-quantal” source package in Quantal:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-raring” source package in Quantal:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-saucy” source package in Quantal:
Invalid
Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Quantal:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Quantal:
Invalid
Status in “linux” source package in Saucy:
Fix Released
Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Saucy:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Saucy:
Invalid
Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Saucy:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-quantal” source package in Saucy:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-raring” source package in Saucy:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-saucy” source package in Saucy:
Invalid
Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Saucy:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Saucy:
Invalid
Status in “linux” source package in Trusty:
Fix Committed
Status in “linux-armadaxp” source package in Trusty:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ec2” source package in Trusty:
Invalid
Status in “linux-fsl-imx51” source package in Trusty:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-quantal” source package in Trusty:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-raring” source package in Trusty:
Invalid
Status in “linux-lts-saucy” source package in Trusty:
Invalid
Status in “linux-mvl-dove” source package in Trusty:
Invalid
Status in “linux-ti-omap4” source package in Trusty:
Invalid
Bug description:
The timeout pointer parameter is provided by userland (hence the
__user annotation) but for x32 syscalls it's simply cast to a kernel
pointer and is passed to __sys_recvmmsg which will eventually directly
dereference it for both reading and writing. Other callers to
__sys_recvmmsg properly copy from userland to the kernel first. The
impact is a sort of arbitrary kernel write-where-what primitive by
unprivileged users where the to-be-written area must contain valid
timespec data initially (the first 64 bit long field must be positive
and the second one must be < 1G).
Break-Fix: ee4fa23c4bfcc635d077a9633d405610de45bc70
2def2ef2ae5f3990aabdbe8a755911902707d268
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1274349/+subscriptions