kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02783
Re: Aperture allocation
-
To:
kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
"hvontres@..." <hvontres@...>
-
Date:
Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:07:42 -0000
-
In-reply-to:
<4A3BB219.9020006@...>
-
User-agent:
eGroups-EW/0.82
--- In kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jean-pierre charras <jean-pierre.charras@...> wrote:
>
> Lorenzo a �crit :
> > I'm refactoring that legacy mess that is the plotting code (i.e. whole routines completely duplicated for HPGL and PS, Gerber treated as 'special'needing aperture selection before operation and so on...)
> >
> > The final idea is to use a common Plotter interface... not that it could be useful but at the end you could plot a schematic on a .pho file :P:P (a WAY MORE useful application is to have the drill diagram as a layer to view over the other ones..)
> >
> > I've got a question about aperture usage/allocation... why do we use a different D-code for a round aperture used for drawing than for an identical aperture for flashing? (actually it will never happen, but anyway...)
> >
> > IIRC there is nothing in the RS274X spec that differentiate them...
> >
> > Is there a reason for this distinction? Maybe someone found some idiot plotter crashing on them?
> >
> > (eyeballing the specs in the meantime)
> >
> This is not mandatory, but this was considered as a "good practice".
> Perhaps DRC and others controls at gerber lever are easier.
>
> I am not sure HPGL is nowadays very useful.
> I am thinking it could be removed.
>
> --
> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
>
One potential uses for keeping hpgl output would be for controling a circuit board router, especialy home-buillt ones.
Follow ups
References