kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03245
Re: Library work and project librarian?
-
To:
kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
"Mateusz" <komorkiewicz@...>
-
Date:
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:43:11 -0000
-
In-reply-to:
<alpine.SOC.1.99.0910072042440.10074@...>
-
User-agent:
eGroups-EW/0.82
What you think about starting separate discussions about 2 & 5 then?
When the new LTS is to be released?
--- In kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vesa Solonen <vsolonen@...> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Mateusz wrote:
> > It is hard for me to follow the discussion as we discuss too many problems at one time!
>
> Multitasking is a bit difficult. Maybe I learn to avoid it some day... ;)
>
> > Vesa, I dare to propose a road map on libraries issues (based on our previous posts), what you think
> > about this:
> >
> > -------------------------------------
> > Libraries RoadMap
> > -------------------------------------
> > 1. Tagging + tag searching
> > 2. Files & components naming policy
> > 3. Creation of GUI tool allowing libraries reordering + adding tags
> > 4. Reordering libraries
> > 5. Official components guidelines + license system
> > 6. Dynamic styles
> > 7. Fixing existing KiCad core libraries to meet the guidelines & styles
> > 8. Web based library system
> > -------------------------------------
> > -------------------------------------
> >
> > This list is simpler for my engineering mind;)
> >
> > Lets focus on one point before we start discussing the next one ...
>
> I fully agree and want to thank you for the road map. Maybe we should
> start with discussing 2. and 5. subjects first as they don't need any
> other work apart from discussion. When we nail down these issues, then we
> may push needed documents to kicad-doc tree and really ordered work can
> start. Others doing the needed implementation may do their work
> independent of these policy issues and I think the productivity will be at
> it's best then. In multiple threads and on special purpose processors.. ;)
>
> It would be nice to make a really polished release for the next Ubuntu
> LTS, would it?
>
> -Vesa
>
Follow ups
References