kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04144
Re: wxDC zoom break through.
-
To:
kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
Dick Hollenbeck <dick@...>
-
Date:
Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:33:04 -0600
-
In-reply-to:
<4B6DC667.9030809@...>
-
Scanners:
none
-
User-agent:
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
I got wxWidgets to compile with --enable-graph_ctx on MinGW/MSYS using
the modified header files and link libraries from the following link
without making any changes.
Nice job Wayne.
http://www.miscdebris.net/blog/2009/09/17/adding-gdi-headers-to-mingw-to-compile-wxwidgets-with-wxgraphicscontext-support/
As far as licensing goes, I can't really answer that. I'm pretty sure
the modified GDI+ header files are not redistributable but I'm not sure
about the executables created from them.
We don't have to distribute the header, we could patch an original.
But.... as you say..... this says nothing of the binaries built from a
modified form of it.
A good reading of the license will help.
The last time I checked, Kicad
builds on Visual Studio so you should be able to build without any
licensing issues that way assuming the GdiPlus headers are included.
Yes, good point. But, out of curiosity, why should we have to
redistribute a Microsoft header file?
Besides, aren't there precompiled wxWidgets libraries for Windows anywhere?
I don't see why everyone has to compile wxWindows for windows. It
should be possible to have a binary repo somewhere, download a binary,
and build on top of it at the Kicad <-> wxWidgets boundary.
Dick
Follow ups
References