kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04265
Re: wxDC & wxGraphicsContext Test
-
To:
kicad-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
From:
"emmedics4" <marco.serantoni@...>
-
Date:
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 09:17:43 -0000
-
In-reply-to:
<4B7C671D.2050502@...>
-
User-agent:
eGroups-EW/0.82
> > I mean if on platform you have tested there is a difference of performance with 1 versus 10 Path ?
> > I've used that number because a number near at the need of pcbnew.
>
> Sorry about the confusion. I did test 1 vs 10 paths and only saw ~0.05s
> difference.
> >> I'm using the AMD64 version of Debian testing (sqeeze) with the NVidia
> >> proprietary drivers and cairo version 1.8.8.
> > Be sure to being using glitz and have OpenGL enabled on the driver.
> I know OpenGL is enabled. I'm not sure about glitz. I'll check and
> rerun the test as necessary.
> > I was suggesting from the beginning the escape of msw/cairo for this reason, moreover
> > GDI+ was dumped in the latest windows releases as the standard is now Direct2D: (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd370990(VS.85).aspx) HWaccelerated, so users are cut in two slices with a cut between XP and Vista.
>
> It may be a while before I get to test msw/cairo. I'm still using
> wxWidgets 2.8.10. I believe the msw/cairo patch was applied to the 2.9
> branch. I don't know if the patch will apply cleanly to 2.8.10 and I
> really don't have time to play around with wxWidgets 2.9.
Wayne, what you have seen on wx2.9 is the forward port of release 60190 done on wx28 branch:
http://svn.wxwidgets.org/viewvc/wx?view=revision&revision=60190
--
Marco
References