kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #05920
Re: New part file format document.
On 12/15/2010 11:39 AM, Vesa Solonen wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
>> On 12/15/2010 7:19 AM, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
>
>>> I would have thought there would need to be a way in the syntax of
>>> showing what was a selectable/finished part and what was merely a
>>> "symbol" or partial part which should not be allowed to be entered
>>> into the schematic directly.
>
> The possibility of adding _just_ symbols with pin function definitions should
> be allowed for flexibility. For discrete and component array design this is
> very convenient. For example ona may draw the logic with discrete transistors
> (without any consideration on actual components), then breadboard the stuff and
> finally decide to take Q1, Q3 and Q4 to Q6 from the transistor array in
> production.
This seems like something that should be handled at the schematic level rather
than the part file level. You could use a sheet that points to a file with
your discrete component Q1, Q3, etc. design and copy that to a different file
name and remove the extra discrete components. For production you just make
the sheet in your schematic point to the file with the discrete components removed.
>
>> If you don't have any objections, I'll update the specification.
>
> Pin and gate swap brought some questions. How to handle the input equality in
> the example NAND gate? Currently there is no pin swap example and pin_renum
> seems to be one possible way for gate swap. Some thought for automatic and
> dynamic text positioning for values and designators might be in order to allow
> rotation and mirroring without rotated and mirrored text. It may need something
> more than just justification hints, but I've got some ideas how to do it
> without part file support. Otherwise I think new part file format is
> approaching perfection :)
I didn't use pin_swap in an example because a 7400 is so simple you typically
wouldn't need to swap any pins. I see pin swapping being useful on component
with a lot of reconfigurable pins (think micro-controllers or gate arrays).
The primary usage pattern I see with pin swapping is say I am 90% done wiring a
32 bit micro-controller in my schematic when I realize that the last couple of
pins are going to turn my schematic into a rats nest. Rather than rip up all
the work you've just done, you could quickly create a new component based on
the existing one and swap the pins that would allow you to finish wiring your
schematic the way you want it to. I can see pin swapping also finding it's way
into the schematic edit. This way you wouldn't even need to create a new part
outside the schematic. Dick's library design also make schematics in library
sources.
Wayne
>
> -Vesa
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References