kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06308
Re: Sweet parser
1))))))))))))))
Wayne,
Any problems changing:
(visible YES)
to
[visible]
Reasoning:
I am looking for conciseness. This means having defaults do the right
thing, most of the time, so that they can be omitted from the expression.
My thinking for properties, is that most are not visible (this is debatable).
This proposed is more concise, and defaults to non visible in the absence of
'visible'.
2)))))))))))))))))
Jean-Pierre or anyone else,
Anyone have and second thoughts on the need to continue with both a pin name
AND a pin number, going forward? I cannot remember why we need both.
Thanks,
Dick
Follow ups
References
-
Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-01-03
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-01-03
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2011-01-03
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-02-14
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-02-28