kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06338
Re: Sweet parser
On 03/25/2011 01:25 AM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
> Le 24/03/2011 19:44, jean-pierre charras a écrit :
>> I do not see and problem to change:
>> number -> name
>> name -> net or signal
>> (signal seems better for me, "net" having other meaning in schematic)
>
> Or:
> number -> padname
> because this is actually a pad name and is less confusing for users.
>
I can go with
padname and signal.
The signal is a chance for the part designer (not the part user) to square a
meaningless padname like "F23" into a signal like "#WE" or "#WAIT".
Dick
References
-
Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2010-12-30
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-01-03
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-01-03
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2011-01-03
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-02-14
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-02-28
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-03-21
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: jean-pierre charras, 2011-03-21
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-03-21
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: jean-pierre charras, 2011-03-21
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2011-03-24
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: jean-pierre charras, 2011-03-24
-
Re: Sweet parser
From: jean-pierre charras, 2011-03-25