kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Dick Hollenbeck <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/06/2011 12:33 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 4/6/2011 1:15 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
>> Le 06/04/2011 18:43, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
>>> On 04/06/2011 11:41 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>>>> On 04/06/2011 11:38 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>>>>> So did we go back and fix the zoom steps?  I remember one step was commented
>>>>> out:  0.7.
>>>>>
>>>>> It needs to be enabled now, and absolutely so on Linux.
>>>> Currently on Linux, if you start eeschema without loading a schematic, the
>>>> sheet border is off screen on top and bottom, suggesting the initial zoom is
>>>> not optimal for viewing the border.
>>>>
>>>> Is this intentional?
>>> It happens in any loading of a schematic, and any sheet change within a
>>> schematic also, and therefore cannot be intentional.
>>>
>> I do not have this problem.
>> Is it a recent issue (BestZoom() was slightly modified in eeschema to fix issue
>> for zoom = 0.7) ?
>>
> I have the same problem as well when the aspect ratio of the drawing window is
> not close to that of the schematic page size.  If wxWidgets 2.9 takes care of
> the non-integer zoom sizes and the problem doesn't exist on Linux or OSX, why
> not revert to the old behavior of best zoom and put 0.7 back into the zoom list
> if we are going to make wxWidget 2.9 a build requirement on windows?

Exactly. 

Do you know this NOT to be the case at this moment?