kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/6/2011 3:26 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> On 04/06/2011 02:05 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> On 4/6/2011 1:37 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>>> On 04/06/2011 12:33 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>>>> On 4/6/2011 1:15 PM, jean-pierre charras wrote:
>>>>> Le 06/04/2011 18:43, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
>>>>>> On 04/06/2011 11:41 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/06/2011 11:38 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>>>>>>>> So did we go back and fix the zoom steps?  I remember one step was commented
>>>>>>>> out:  0.7.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It needs to be enabled now, and absolutely so on Linux.
>>>>>>> Currently on Linux, if you start eeschema without loading a schematic, the
>>>>>>> sheet border is off screen on top and bottom, suggesting the initial zoom is
>>>>>>> not optimal for viewing the border.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this intentional?
>>>>>> It happens in any loading of a schematic, and any sheet change within a
>>>>>> schematic also, and therefore cannot be intentional.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I do not have this problem.
>>>>> Is it a recent issue (BestZoom() was slightly modified in eeschema to fix issue
>>>>> for zoom = 0.7) ?
>>>>>
>>>> I have the same problem as well when the aspect ratio of the drawing window is
>>>> not close to that of the schematic page size.  If wxWidgets 2.9 takes care of
>>>> the non-integer zoom sizes and the problem doesn't exist on Linux or OSX, why
>>>> not revert to the old behavior of best zoom and put 0.7 back into the zoom list
>>>> if we are going to make wxWidget 2.9 a build requirement on windows?
>>> Exactly. 
>>>
>>> Do you know this NOT to be the case at this moment?
> 
> 
> 
>> If you are referring to the best zoom behavior I was under the impression that
>> JP was still sorting that out.  That may have been a poor assumption on my part.
> 
> I meant:
> Has the code been reverted?

Not yet.  If JP doesn't get to it in the next couple of days, I'll change it back.

Wayne

> 
> 
>> If you are talking about wxWidgets 2.9 being the required version for building
>> kicad on windows, I wasn't aware that a decision has been made.  I thought it
>> was just a proposal by JP.  In any event, we should create a cmake macro to
>> verify the version of wxWidgets found is correct.
> 
> On windows: 2.9.2 is required
> 
> On linux: either 2.8 or 2.92.
> 
> There is no practical alternative.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>