kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Dick Hollenbeck <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/15/2012 09:17 AM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 03:40:33PM +0200, Edwin van den Oetelaar wrote:
>> If there is a fundamental reason, which would be very strange, for
>> using bitmasks then let them be.
> Some kind of 'layer set' is needed; at the moment a bitmask is the
> simpler implementation of the concept. Also it needs to provide a way to
> be loaded from an int and be serialized.
>
> These are the requirements.
>

We have these requirements already.

int is the layer set, and wayne is working on serialization.