kicad-developers team mailing list archive
Mailing list archive
Re: About today bzr update
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:24:39AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> Without verifying the truth of your statement about copying, I would say iterating over a
> loop should not need to copy objects.
Looking around it seems that the issue is copying *pointers* to the
object when copying the whole collection.
> BOOST_FOREACH seems truly not to be for everyone as the name would suggest (FOREACH is a
> lie, it is not for me).
> I've never used it, ever. If I cannot write the three controlling statements in for loop
> on a standard container, then its time to retire, or find a new container.
IMHO an std::vector<LIBITEM*> would do the trick, but depends on who
'owns' the pointers... it seems that the whole pointer collection
library is made to simplify memory management but, as I said, it's the
first time I open the manpage.
boost probably works well when you implements all the required contracts
(like their clonable instead of our clone and so on) *or* you declare
the proper traits or marker classes (the whole traits issue in C++ is
something I hate a lot). For example they have a 'non copiable' ancestor
to mark all the class which are not to be copied (or something like
Also the error messages when templates are involved are something to panic at :D
Compilation time is also a (minor) issue...