kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Lorenzo Marcantonio <l.marcantonio@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:03:21PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> compiling and I didn't apply patch 002 because of Dick's comments.

What was the problem with 002?

Anyway, stop at 21, since 22 is broken. Some are independent, other
obviously not. For example, backing off 22 requires rollback of
23,24,25 while 26 and 27 are separated from it.
(separating 'cleanly' wires from buses and notes *is* difficult...)
23 in fact would completely fail after the 'variable bus width' (which
partly replicates...)

Apply what you can and I should have no problem regenerating them
against the 'tip' (I did more difficult thing in the past :P)


-- 
Lorenzo Marcantonio
Logos Srl