kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Travis Ayres <trayres@xxxxxxxxx>]

We could entirely avoid the python 2/3 question by implementing and
sticking with C++, and if we arent going to get satisfactory speed it would
forever doom the tool to toy status
On Apr 30, 2013 12:50 PM, "Lorenzo Marcantonio" <l.marcantonio@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 02:00:16PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> > I agree with you, to the extent that having some new code in wxPthon is
> likely to
> > accelerate the evolution of KiCad to near epic speed.  Simply
> categorizing, organizing,
> > and gathering, will be an extreme challenge.  Even some terminology must
> be agreed upon so
> > that we can talk about it.  Types of scripts: python on C++, or python
> under C++ UI, etc.
>
> Slow stuff under C++ :D
>
> Really, I'm not satisfied with python speed *expecially* for wxPython
>
> Also the C++ bindings are all but robust, at the moment.
>
> --
> Lorenzo Marcantonio
> Logos Srl
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>