kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Dick Hollenbeck <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/30/2013 07:06 PM, Travis Ayres wrote:
> We could entirely avoid the python 2/3 question by implementing and sticking with C++, and
> if we arent going to get satisfactory speed it would forever doom the tool to toy status


click, delete.


> 
> On Apr 30, 2013 12:50 PM, "Lorenzo Marcantonio" <l.marcantonio@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:l.marcantonio@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 02:00:16PM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
>     > I agree with you, to the extent that having some new code in wxPthon is likely to
>     > accelerate the evolution of KiCad to near epic speed.  Simply categorizing, organizing,
>     > and gathering, will be an extreme challenge.  Even some terminology must be agreed
>     upon so
>     > that we can talk about it.  Types of scripts: python on C++, or python under C++ UI,
>     etc.
> 
>     Slow stuff under C++ :D
> 
>     Really, I'm not satisfied with python speed *expecially* for wxPython
> 
>     Also the C++ bindings are all but robust, at the moment.
> 
>     --
>     Lorenzo Marcantonio
>     Logos Srl
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>     Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
>     More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>