kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #11836
Re: Proposal: Move to C++11 (time to revisit?)
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 08:57:56AM -0500, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> In the future, I suggest you refrain from using terms like "modern
> programming practices" when trying to convince developers (at least this
> developer anyway) that the change you are proposing is worthwhile. This
> is an automatic red flag for me. It sounds like a bunch of marketing
> hype rather than a well thought out technical argument. While I agree
> std::xxxx is more readable than using namespaces, there is nothing
> "modern" about writing readable code. Good coding practices have been
> around since "good old days" of assembly and C. Over the last 25 years,
Practical example of 'modern programming practice' (implemented by boost
and other)... FUNCTORS
Really really unconvenient & ugly & a total waste of time in 90% of the
cases.
Really miss lambdas in C++ :P (they say they are adding them... I fear
the result...)
--
Lorenzo Marcantonio
Logos Srl
Follow ups
References