kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #12821
Re: KiCad git-based libraries as a way to harvest users' contributions - does it work?
"Does it work?"
When Git library repository - I mean symbols, this is my only point of
interest - was started few months ago there is one master branch, and
four (If I'm wrong, sb corect me) registered contributors. Now we have
eight and few people who have their own forks based on master branch.
Using Git search engine and searching for "kicad", system said: "We've
found 312 repository results". Even if we filter out current pretty
repos we still have got about two hundred. I have look into a couple of
it and there is something interesting in it which may enlarge the
current libraries resource. Can we acquire these people? Or unique
symbols/footprints which they done? I think yes.
So, the answer for: "Does it work?" is "It works". Partially it works.
But there is one thing that must be done as soon as possible, before
users throw on the creation of libraries. Clear and understandable by
everyone library creating policy. Actually "we" don't have it, and
symbols have different styles: various pin length (Is there any reason
to keep 0.3" as default value?), various text size, sometimes
disproportionation symbol body size. Awful (IMHO).
From a drawing point of view, footprints looks better because there is
no room to any extravagance. The only unclear thing is footprint naming
convention. SOT-23 or SOT23, SO8 or SO-8 or SOIC8 or SOIC-8-N. Opinions
are divided, and the discussion on library-committers list was stuck in
place.
ps. Sorry people, but I have to put my 5 cents in this discussion.
Kerusey Karyu