← Back to team overview

kicad-developers team mailing list archive

Re: update on IDF tools and patch

 

----- Original Message -----

> From: jp charras <jp.charras@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Cirilo Bernardo <cirilo_bernardo@xxxxxxxxx>; KiCad Developers <kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] update on IDF tools and patch
> 
> Le 25/05/2014 03:15, Cirilo Bernardo a écrit :
> 
>>  Hi folks,
>> 
>>   The latest IDF code has been checked for coding style and tested
>>  for bugs. The patch I created will only make changes to the
>>  utils/idftools directory, so it's safe to include in the main branch
>>  and won't affect the rest of KiCad at all.
>> 
>>   The code is currently used only for the various IDF tools, but I
>>  intend to rewrite the IDF export code and VRML export code to make
>>  use of this new(er) codebase; among other things this newer codebase
>>  fixes a number of bugs which I have found in the VRML and IDF
>>  export code.
>> 
>>   I would appreciate some comments on what to do with this code in
>>  the future. I would like to see it compiled as a shared library so that
>>  the VRML and IDF exporter as well as the IDF tools can make use of it
>>  without the bloat of static libraries.  Since the code will only be
>>  common to the pcbnew exporters and the IDF tools, I thought that the
>>  IDF framework code would be best placed in an 'idf' directory in 
> the
>>  top of the source tree if/when it is finally included in KiCad.
>> 
>>   In principle the new IDF code will also make it pretty easy to add an
>>  IDF importer, but since no one has requested such a tool and I don't
>>  need it, I haven't bothered to write such a thing.
>> 
>>   I tried to build and link the IDF code as a shared library but the
>>  linking of idf2vrml failed with undefined references; after banging my
>>  head on the desk wondering why cmake wasn't doing what I expected it 
> to,
>>  I gave up and built as STATIC. If anyone can see what I've been doing
>>  wrong I'd appreciate some feedback on that.
> 
> Thanks, Cirilo.
> 
> I have an issue with the macro ERROR, which conflicts with an other
> system macro.
> 
> May I ask you to change its name to ERROR_IDF, or something else.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
> 

Thanks Jean-Pierre,  the macro name has been changed to ERROR_IDF in the latest patch.

- Cirilo


Follow ups

References