kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Benoît Roehr <benoit.roehr.ec@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello dear developers.

Le 08/10/2014 10:08, Andrew Zonenberg a écrit :
> Second the vote for consistency, no matter which way it goes.
>
> Personally, I have a slight preference for "footprint" over "module" as
> well.
>
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 18:56 +1100, Mitch Davis wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Mark Roszko <mark.roszko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hehe, well, I guess everything can be renamed in the opposite
> > > direction. But consistency is needed.
> > YES PLEASE!  A number of people I've spoken to were really confused by
> > this inconsistency.
> >
> > I use footprint myself.  Though footprint seems to imply what a PCB
> > must have in order to accommodate a part, eg, pads, silk.  Are the 3d
> > models part of this?  If they are, then footprint might not be the
> > best term.
I agree with this. What you want to rename "Footprint" is more or less a 
container unifying different PCB objects (pads, lines, 3d model...), but 
may not be a footprint (logos, mounting holes, screws...)

Altium folks use the "Component" term both in Schematic libraries and 
PCB libraries. You know what you are looking at knowing what type of 
library is browsed. I don't remember for Proteus.

Benoît.
> > Mitch.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to     : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp