kicad-developers team mailing list archive

[Tomasz Wlostowski <tomasz.wlostowski@xxxxxxx>]

On 20.10.2014 17:25, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:47:54AM -0400, Carl Poirier wrote:
> > I feel like we wouldn't use the last digit much in a triplet number
> > because, IIRC, backporting of fixes is not planned. That being said, I
> > would also begin with at least 2.1, as Cirilo said.
> >
> > However, I personally vote for numbering the versions a la MATLAB.
>
> I am not a dev, I know, so my 0.002 cents on N.N numbering starting from 2.0
> or 2.1 ...
How about an Ubuntu-ish scheme with year/month? e.g. 2015.01?

My 10e-6 cents...

Cheers,
Tom